Comparative evaluation of retention and antibacterial efficacy of Compomer and Glass Hybrid Bulk Fill restorative material as a conservative adhesive restoration in children with mixed dentition An

Authors

Madhura V. Mundada, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (KAHER), KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
Shivayogi M. Hugar, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences, KAHER, Belagavi, Karnataka, Indi
Seema Hallikerimath, Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences, KAHER, Belagavi, Karnataka, Indi
Chandrashekhar M. Badkar, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences, KAHER, Belagavi, Karnataka, Indi
Rucha Davalbhakta, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences, KAHER, Belagavi, Karnataka, Indi
Sanjana P. Soneta, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences, KAHER, Belagavi, Karnataka, Indi

Abstract

AIM:

The aim of the study is to compare and evaluate the retention and antibacterial efficacy of Compomer and Glass Hybrid Bulk Fill restorative material as a conservative adhesive restoration in children with mixed dentition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Sixty children of age 6–12 years with mixed dentition were selected and divided into Group I – Compomer and Group II – Glass Hybrid Bulk Fill. After thorough oral prophylaxis and baseline collection of saliva, restorative treatment was carried out using the two materials. Retention of the material and salivary

Streptococcus mutans

count (CFU/ml of saliva) was estimated at 1 month and 3 months after restorative procedure.

RESULTS:

The retention rate with Glass Hybrid Bulk Fill group and Compomer group was 100%. Statistical significant reduction in salivary

S. mutans

colony count was seen with both the groups at both different time intervals. Maximum reduction was noted in Glass Hybrid Bulk Fill group at 3-month intervals, and gradual reduction was seen with Compomer group.

CONCLUSION:

Both the materials, Glass Hybrid Bulk Fill restorative material and Compomer, showed good retention. Moreover, both the materials have shown good antimicrobial activity after 3-month follow-up.

Recommended Citation

Mundada, Madhura V.; Hugar, Shivayogi M.; Hallikerimath, Seema; Badkar, Chandrashekhar M.; Davalbhakta, Rucha; and Soneta, Sanjana P. (2019) "Comparative evaluation of retention and antibacterial efficacy of Compomer and Glass Hybrid Bulk Fill restorative material as a conservative adhesive restoration in children with mixed dentition An," Indian Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research KLEU: Vol. 12: Iss. 3, Article 9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/kleuhsj.kleuhsj_244_18
Available at: https://kleijhsbr.researchcommons.org/journal/vol12/iss3/9

Pages

233

Last Page

236

Copyright

© 2019 Indian Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research KLEU | Published by Wolters Kluwer – Medknow